Skip to content
Crown Legal Report Reporting and reference on United States law All coverageSearch

      Desks

      About

      Immigration & Border Law

      Adoption-Based Immigration Under the Hague Convention

      An intercountry adoption is two proceedings running in parallel: a family law case abroad and an immigration case at home. The convention exists to force them into a sequence, and the sequence is the part that goes wrong.

      5 min readFederal rule

      A caseworker sits with a folder of documents across a low table from a couple in a small consular waiting room.
      Most of a convention case is documentary, and most of what goes wrong is a step taken in the wrong order. DVIDSHUB · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons

      What this report covers

      • The convention applies where both countries are parties and the child habitually resides in the other one.
      • An accredited or approved adoption service provider must act as the primary provider.
      • Suitability of the prospective parents is determined before any child is identified.
      • The child's eligibility must be determined before the adoption or grant of custody takes place.
      • Adopting out of order is the single most common cause of an unfixable case.
      • The immigrant classification the child receives determines whether citizenship is automatic on entry.

      Intercountry adoption is unusual among immigration matters in that the immigration question is decided partly by a foreign family court and partly by an American agency, and neither can proceed without the other. The convention exists to impose an order on that, and the order is not optional.

      Which cases the convention governs

      Three conditions have to be met for a case to run under the convention framework: both countries are parties to it, the child habitually resides in the other country, and the child is being moved for the purpose of adoption by parents habitually resident here. Where any of those is missing, the case falls under the older orphan route instead, and that route has a different definition and a different order of steps.

      The framework also introduces a party who does not exist in ordinary immigration filings: the primary provider. An accredited or approved adoption service provider must be identified and must be responsible for ensuring that all six adoption services are performed, whether by itself or by supervised providers. A case without a primary provider is not merely irregular; it is outside the system the convention created.

      The sequence, and why it is rigid

      1. Suitability. The prospective parents file for a determination that they are suitable and eligible to adopt, supported by a home study prepared to the required standard.
      2. Match. Only after approval does the country of origin propose a child, with a medical and social history report.
      3. Eligibility. The parents file the petition for the identified child, and the agency determines that the child meets the definition and is likely to be admissible.
      4. The Article 5 or 17 letter. The central authorities exchange the notice that the child may be entrusted, which is the document releasing the foreign proceeding to continue.
      5. Adoption or grant of custody abroad, followed by the visa application and admission.
      Do not adopt first

      The whole architecture depends on eligibility being determined before custody changes hands, because that is what demonstrates the consents were properly obtained and no domestic placement was available. An adoption completed ahead of that determination can leave a child who cannot be brought in at all.

      The convention route against the orphan route

      FeatureConvention routeOrphan route
      When it appliesBoth countries are convention partiesThe child's country is not a convention party
      Order of stepsEligibility determined before adoption or custodyAdoption may precede the petition in some configurations
      Provider requirementAn accredited primary provider is mandatoryNo equivalent accreditation requirement
      Core definitionChild eligible for intercountry adoption under the conventionOrphan as defined by the statute, with its own tests
      Central authorityBoth states act through designated central authoritiesNo central authority mechanism
      Classification on entryDepends on whether a full adoption occurred abroadDepends on the same question, under different letters

      The last row is where citizenship is decided. Where a full and final adoption took place abroad with both parents having seen the child, the classification granted reflects a completed adoption and citizenship generally follows on admission. Where the adoption will be completed at home, the child enters for that purpose and the acquisition of citizenship follows the completion, sometimes through a separate application for a child residing abroad.

      The evidence, and where it is slow

      Three files run at once and each has its own bottleneck. The home study must be prepared by a qualified person and must address the specific matters the regulation lists. The child's file must include the medical and social history and the evidence of consent. And the parents' file must include civil documents and clearances for every place either of them has lived, which is where the calendar usually slips — police and court certificates vary by country in what they cover and who may issue them, and a certificate that is technically correct but from the wrong authority has to be obtained again.

      Because the sequence cannot be reordered, a delay in one file stalls everything downstream. That is also why choosing whether a case belongs under the convention or the orphan framework — a question that arises whenever a country's status changes or a child's habitual residence is arguable — is a decision worth settling at the outset with family-based immigration counsel rather than midway through, because a case begun under the wrong framework generally cannot be transferred into the right one.

      Admission, and what happens afterwards

      At the visa stage the child undergoes the medical examination that every immigrant applicant undergoes, and the examination has to be performed by an authorized physician on the prescribed form. Vaccination requirements are applied with adjustments for young children, and waivers exist where the objection is religious or the schedule is not age-appropriate.

      After admission the family's work is not finished. Where the adoption is to be completed at home, it should be completed promptly, because the child's citizenship and the parents' ability to obtain ordinary documents depend on it. Where citizenship was acquired on entry, evidence of it should be obtained rather than assumed, since a certificate is what schools, passport offices and employers will eventually ask to see.

      Sources

      1. Cornell Legal Information Institute — 8 U.S.C. § 1101(b)(1)

        The definitions of child that adoption cases depend on.

      2. Cornell Legal Information Institute — 8 U.S.C. § 1431

        Automatic acquisition of citizenship by a child of a citizen parent.

      3. eCFR — 8 CFR Part 204, Immigrant Petitions

        The convention adoption subpart, including suitability and eligibility findings.

      4. USCIS — Hague Process

        The order of filings and what each stage determines.

      5. USCIS — Form I-800A, Application for Determination of Suitability

        The suitability application, its evidence and where current fees are published.

      6. U.S. Department of State — Intercountry Adoption

        Country information, accredited providers and the central authority function.

      Questions readers ask

      What happens if the adoption is completed before the eligibility determination?

      It can put the case beyond repair. The convention framework requires that the child be determined eligible, and the parents suitable, before custody or adoption is granted, because the point of the sequence is to establish that no domestic placement was available and that consents were properly obtained. An adoption completed first may not be recognized for immigration purposes, and there is often no route to cure it afterwards.

      Do both spouses have to travel?

      The requirements about seeing the child differ by route, and in convention cases the framework and the country of origin's own law drive the answer. Many countries require both prospective parents to appear before the competent authority, and some require a period of residence in the country. The immigration file follows what the foreign proceeding actually required and recorded, so the travel plan should be settled with the provider before flights are booked.

      Does the child become a citizen automatically?

      Frequently, but not universally. A child admitted as a lawful permanent resident who is under eighteen, in the legal and physical custody of a citizen parent, and residing in that parent's household generally acquires citizenship by operation of law. Where the classification granted reflects an adoption still to be completed at home, citizenship follows the completion of that adoption rather than the entry.